Part I
641
Apologies and substitutions.
There were no apologies for absence.
642
Declarations of interest.
The following interests were declared at the meeting: (a) Councillor Collins - Agenda Item No. 6 (Chalkwell and Leigh Area Parking Issues) - Disqualifying non-pecuniary: He and his family parks in the area (withdrew); (b) Councillor Grimwade - Agenda Item No. 5 (Petition Regarding Traffic Calming - The Fairway) - Non pecuniary interest: Lives in road in the area; (c) Councillor Anne Jones - Agenda Item No. 8 (Members' Requests List) - Non-pecuniary interest: Child attends School in one of the roads listed. (d) Councillor Van Looy - Agenda Item No. 6 (Chalkwell and Leigh Area Parking Issues) and Agenda Item No. 8 (Members Requests List) - Non-pecuniary: Owns a Cafe in Western Esplanade; (e) Councillor Van Looy - Agenda Item No. 7 (Requests for New or Amended Waiting Restrictions) - Non-pecuniary interest: Family Member lives in Western Road.
643
Minutes of the Meeting held on Thursday, 6th September, 2012
Resolved: That the Minutes of the meeting held on Thursday, 6th September 2012 be received, confirmed as a correct record and signed.
644
Objections to Traffic Regulation Orders - Various Areas
Resolved: 1. That the proposals for Portland Avenue and Quebec Avenue be confirmed and implemented as advertised. 2. That the proposals for Moor Park Gardens be confirmed with amendments so as to reduce the length of the restrictions and that the Head of Planning & Transport be authorised to determine the extent of the waiting restrictions following consultation with the residents in the street affected. 3. That the proposals for Herschell Road not be progressed but that the Corporate Director Enterprise, Tourism and the Environment be authorised to advertise alternative waiting restrictions on the west side of Herschell Road. 4. That the proposals for Stephenson Road be confirmed and implemented as advertised. 5. That the proposals for Glendale Gardens be confirmed and implemented as advertised. 6. That the proposals for Tattersall Gardens be confirmed and implemented as advertised. Reasons for Decision All proposals were advertised with an aim to improve highway safety and to reduce congestion, which were the concerns and considerations leading to the proposals. Other Options Do nothing - safety could be compromised. Note: This is an Executive function Eligible for call-in to the Economic & Environmental Scrutiny Committee Executive Councillor: Cox
645
Petition Regarding Traffic Calming - The Fairway
Resolved: 1. That the content of the petition and the comments of officers on the issues raised be noted. 2. That the suitability of the current location of the existing speed warning sign be monitored. 3. That this location be added to the list of priority roads for the installation of the mobile variable messaging signs and that the Road Safety Education Team be requested to assist in the location of the mobile signs. 4. That no further action be taken at this time. Reason for Decision The decision is based on data regarding collisions and traffic flows. Other Options Implement the measures as proposed by the petitioners - Removing The Fairway from the designated distributor route would adversely impact on the traffic movement and is not considered appropriate. Similarly introducing 20mph speed limit is unlikely to have any impact on any collisions as speed is not a contributory factor in accidents. Note: This is an Executive function Eligible for call-in to the Economic & Environmental Scrutiny Committee Executive Councillor: Cox*Called in to:- Economic & Environmental Scrutiny Committee
646
Chalkwell and Leigh Area Parking Issues
Resolved: 1. That the proposals set out in paragraph 4 of the report of the Corporate Director Enterprise, Tourism and the Environment be approved and a further report be submitted to a future meeting of the Traffic & Parking Working Party and Cabinet Committee for consideration following completion of the initial consultations of the Councillors of the Wards affected. 2. That any proposals for this area include the possible introduction of waiting restrictions in Marine Parade and Marine Close. Reason for Decision To identify feasible options and recommend the way forward to address residents concerns. Other Options To consider an area wide parking management scheme. This does not appear to be a viable option at this stage based on past experience through consultation and the views expressed by those present at the last meeting. On the other hand taking "No Action" is an option which is not recommended. The options presented have been agreed by Ward Councillors from Chalkwell and Leigh and offer a way forward to address some of the key concerns raised by the residents at this stage whilst the follow-up consultation by Ward Councillors can proceed on the Parking Management Scheme option. Note: This is an Executive function Eligible for call-in to the Economic & Environmental Scrutiny Committee Executive Councillor: Cox
647
Requests for New or Amended Waiting Restrictions
Resolved: 1. That the Corporate Director Enterprise, Tourism and the Environment be authorised to advertise traffic regulation orders for new and amendments to waiting restrictions at the following locations: Shirley Road at its junction with Arterial Road; Cottesmore Gardens, Berkeley Gardens, Quorn Gardens at the junctions with Western Road; Cheddar Avenue opposite its junction with Mendip Crescent; and Bridgwater Drive 2. That the extent and timing of the proposed waiting restrictions in Bridgwater Drive be investigated and reported back to the Traffic & Parking Working Party and Cabinet Committee prior to statutory advertisement. 3. That the proposed amendments to the restrictions in Queens Road (Milton Parking Management Scheme) to enable the resident only parking bays to be a used as permit holder or pay and display be approved. 4. That no action be taken as regards the proposals relating to Strand Wharf. Reason for Decision To mitigate for likelihood of traffic flows being impeded, to improve safety or increase parking availability. Other Options Each request needs to be considered on individual merit and their impact on public safety, traffic flows or parking. Members could consider taking no further action if they feel it is appropriate. Note: This is an Executive function Eligible for call-in to the Economic & Environmental Scrutiny Committee Executive Councillor: Cox
648
Members Requests List
Resolved: 1. That recommendations of officers in relation to the requests Ref Nos. 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 30 and 38 as set out in Appendix 1 of the report of the Corporate Director Enterprise, Tourism and the Environment be approved. 2. That the Corporate Director Enterprise, Tourism and the Environment be authorised to advertise the proposed amendments to the restrictions set out in requests ref nos. 2 and 8 in Appendix 1 of the report. 3. That the request for the removal of the waiting restrictions at the end of the Eastern Avenue Service Road be reviewed and, if appropriate, the Corporate Director Enterprise, Tourism and the Environment be authorised to advertise the necessary amendments to the waiting restrictions. 4. That the criteria for dealing with requests for waiting restrictions be amended so that requests for junction protection are included as a separate matter. Reason for Decision To provide a rationalised management and decision making process for all formal requests for highways and traffic management improvements by Ward Councillors via the Traffic and Parking Working Party & Cabinet Committee. This enables the Cabinet Committee to making informed decisions within the overall context of priorities and workload. Other Options Agree all requests - not feasible Do nothing - some requests are necessary for highway safety or traffic management improvements. Note: This is an Executive function Eligible for call-in to the Economic & Environmental Scrutiny Committee Executive Councillor: Cox